82 ECT EB double wall: box compression and stacking table

82 ECT EB double wall pairs a 82 lb/in edge crush with a nominal 0.188 in caliper. As an empty 12 × 12 × 12 in box, the simplified McKee formula puts it near 1,444 lbf of top-to-bottom compression before any allowance for storage or humidity.

Compression, derated for storage time

BCT after storage losses, lbf, 82 ECT EB double wall
Inside size, in0 days10 days30 days90 days180 days
8 × 6 × 41,103695662607551
10 × 8 × 61,251788750688625
12 × 12 × 121,444910866794722
14 × 10 × 81,444910866794722
16 × 12 × 101,560983936858780
18 × 12 × 121,6141,017969888807
18 × 18 × 181,7691,1141,061973884
20 × 16 × 141,7691,1141,061973884
24 × 18 × 181,9101,2031,1461,051955
24 × 24 × 242,0421,2871,2251,1231,021

0 days is the McKee estimate itself. Storage losses are Packgent's default assumptions (10 days 37%, 30 days 40%, 90 days 45%, 180 days 50%), not sourced values; edit them in the stacking calculator.

How many high can it stack?

Boxes high, including the bottom one, column stacked for 30 days, before humidity, interlock or overhang losses.

12 × 10 × 8 in, BCT ≈ 1,383 lbf
Gross weight per box10 lb20 lb30 lb40 lb60 lb
Boxes high8342282114
16 × 12 × 10 in, BCT ≈ 1,560 lbf
Gross weight per box10 lb20 lb30 lb40 lb60 lb
Boxes high9447322416
20 × 16 × 12 in, BCT ≈ 1,769 lbf
Gross weight per box10 lb20 lb30 lb40 lb60 lb
Boxes high10754362718

Boxes high = ⌊BCT × (1 − 0.4) ÷ gross weight⌋ + 1. A real stack needs further allowance for humidity, pattern and handling.

Neighbouring grades

GradeECT changeBCT change, same flute and size
71 ECT-11 lb/in-13%

In McKee, BCT scales directly with ECT, so the percentage change in strength equals the change in ECT.

Freight rule limits

NMFC Item 222 ties each grade to a maximum gross weight and size for LTL shipping. Packgent has not published those limits yet because they could not be checked against the current tariff. See the Item 222 page for status.

Sources

  1. TAPPI T 811: Edgewise compressive strength of corrugated fibreboard (short column test)
  2. McKee, R.C., Gander, J.W. & Wachuta, J.R. (1963). "Compression strength formula for corrugated boxes." Paperboard Packaging 48(8): 149–159
  3. Flute calipers: Foster (1997), Wiley Encyclopedia of Packaging Technology

Last reviewed . See all sources and how Packgent computes.