71 ECT BC double wall: box compression and stacking table

71 ECT BC double wall pairs a 71 lb/in edge crush with a nominal 0.281 in caliper. As an empty 12 × 12 × 12 in box, the simplified McKee formula puts it near 1,531 lbf of top-to-bottom compression before any allowance for storage or humidity.

Compression, derated for storage time

BCT after storage losses, lbf, 71 ECT BC double wall
Inside size, in0 days10 days30 days90 days180 days
8 × 6 × 41,170737702643585
10 × 8 × 61,326836796729663
12 × 12 × 121,531965919842766
14 × 10 × 81,531965919842766
16 × 12 × 101,6541,042992910827
18 × 12 × 121,7121,0791,027942856
18 × 18 × 181,8761,1821,1251,032938
20 × 16 × 141,8761,1821,1251,032938
24 × 18 × 182,0261,2761,2161,1141,013
24 × 24 × 242,1661,3641,2991,1911,083

0 days is the McKee estimate itself. Storage losses are Packgent's default assumptions (10 days 37%, 30 days 40%, 90 days 45%, 180 days 50%), not sourced values; edit them in the stacking calculator.

How many high can it stack?

Boxes high, including the bottom one, column stacked for 30 days, before humidity, interlock or overhang losses.

12 × 10 × 8 in, BCT ≈ 1,466 lbf
Gross weight per box10 lb20 lb30 lb40 lb60 lb
Boxes high8844302215
16 × 12 × 10 in, BCT ≈ 1,654 lbf
Gross weight per box10 lb20 lb30 lb40 lb60 lb
Boxes high10050342517
20 × 16 × 12 in, BCT ≈ 1,876 lbf
Gross weight per box10 lb20 lb30 lb40 lb60 lb
Boxes high11357382919

Boxes high = ⌊BCT × (1 − 0.4) ÷ gross weight⌋ + 1. A real stack needs further allowance for humidity, pattern and handling.

Neighbouring grades

GradeECT changeBCT change, same flute and size
61 ECT-10 lb/in-14%
82 ECT+11 lb/in+15%

In McKee, BCT scales directly with ECT, so the percentage change in strength equals the change in ECT.

Freight rule limits

NMFC Item 222 ties each grade to a maximum gross weight and size for LTL shipping. Packgent has not published those limits yet because they could not be checked against the current tariff. See the Item 222 page for status.

Sources

  1. TAPPI T 811: Edgewise compressive strength of corrugated fibreboard (short column test)
  2. McKee, R.C., Gander, J.W. & Wachuta, J.R. (1963). "Compression strength formula for corrugated boxes." Paperboard Packaging 48(8): 149–159
  3. Flute calipers: Foster (1997), Wiley Encyclopedia of Packaging Technology

Last reviewed . See all sources and how Packgent computes.